ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Impact of evidence-based nursing interventions on psychological status and myocardial injury in patients with myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention for reperfusion injury.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction can cause reperfusion injury with both physical and psychological impacts on patients. This study aims to assess how evidence-based nursing affects psychological state and myocardial injury in reperfusion injury in patients with myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention. Method: Ninety patients with myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were confirmed to have postoperative reperfusion injury were randomly divided into a control group that received conventional care or an intervention group that received evidence-based nursing intervention. The levels of cardiac function indicators (left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter), myocardial injury markers (N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin I), psychological status (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores), the incidence of complications, mortality rate, and satisfaction with nursing care were compared before and after the intervention. Results: Compared to pre-intervention, after the intervention, both groups showed reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin I levels, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores, with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction. The intervention group demonstrated superior outcomes in all these metrics compared to the control group, with lower rates of complications and mortality, and higher satisfaction levels. Conclusion: Implementing evidence-based nursing in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for reperfusion injury can improve cardiac function, alleviate myocardial injury and psychological status, reduce the incidence of complications, and enhance patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.