ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2025
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Reconstructive Microsurgery.
Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Prediction and Assessment of Compromised Free Flaps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- [A brief discussion on microsurgery techniques and free perforator flaps for wound repair].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- AI-Empowered Mechanomedicine for Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies are transforming reconstructive microsurgery through data-driven approaches that enhance precision and standardize clinical workflows. These innovations address long-standing challenges, including subjective assessment methodologies, operator-dependent decision-making, and inconsistent monitoring protocols across the perioperative continuum. Contemporary applications demonstrate remarkable capabilities in preoperative risk stratification, with ML algorithms achieving high predictive accuracy for complications such as flap loss and donor site morbidity. CNNs have revolutionized perforator localization, with advanced models achieving Dice coefficients of 91.87% in anatomical structure detection from CT angiography. Intraoperative assistance through AI-enhanced robotic platforms provides submillimeter precision and tremor filtration, particularly beneficial in supermicrosurgery involving vessels measuring 0.3- to 0.8-mm diameter. Postoperative monitoring represents a particularly promising domain, where AI-based image analysis systems achieve 98.4% accuracy in classifying flap perfusion status and detecting early vascular compromise. Automated platforms may enable continuous surveillance with reduced clinical workload while maintaining superior consistency compared with traditional subjective methods. Patient communication benefits from AI-driven visual simulation and large language models (LLMs) that generate personalized educational materials, enhancing informed consent processes. Critical implementation challenges include data quality, algorithmic bias, and inherent dataset imbalance, where complications represent rare but clinically crucial events. Future advancement requires explainable AI systems, multi-institutional collaboration, and comprehensive regulatory frameworks. When thoughtfully integrated, AI serves as a powerful augmentation tool that elevates microsurgical precision and outcomes while preserving the fundamental importance of surgical expertise and clinical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.