Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786023›Full record

ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2025

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Reconstructive Microsurgery.

Ta-Chun Lin, Hsi-An Yang, Ren-Wen Huang, Cheng-Hung Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ta-Chun LinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsi-An YangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ren-Wen HuangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hung LinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies are transforming reconstructive microsurgery through data-driven approaches that enhance precision and standardize clinical workflows. These innovations address long-standing challenges, including subjective assessment methodologies, operator-dependent decision-making, and inconsistent monitoring protocols across the perioperative continuum. Contemporary applications demonstrate remarkable capabilities in preoperative risk stratification, with ML algorithms achieving high predictive accuracy for complications such as flap loss and donor site morbidity. CNNs have revolutionized perforator localization, with advanced models achieving Dice coefficients of 91.87% in anatomical structure detection from CT angiography. Intraoperative assistance through AI-enhanced robotic platforms provides submillimeter precision and tremor filtration, particularly beneficial in supermicrosurgery involving vessels measuring 0.3- to 0.8-mm diameter. Postoperative monitoring represents a particularly promising domain, where AI-based image analysis systems achieve 98.4% accuracy in classifying flap perfusion status and detecting early vascular compromise. Automated platforms may enable continuous surveillance with reduced clinical workload while maintaining superior consistency compared with traditional subjective methods. Patient communication benefits from AI-driven visual simulation and large language models (LLMs) that generate personalized educational materials, enhancing informed consent processes. Critical implementation challenges include data quality, algorithmic bias, and inherent dataset imbalance, where complications represent rare but clinically crucial events. Future advancement requires explainable AI systems, multi-institutional collaboration, and comprehensive regulatory frameworks. When thoughtfully integrated, AI serves as a powerful augmentation tool that elevates microsurgical precision and outcomes while preserving the fundamental importance of surgical expertise and clinical judgment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceflap monitoringmachine learningreconstructive microsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40786023
PMCPMC12334263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.