ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2025
An Introduction to Machine Learning for Speech-Language Pathologists: Concepts, Terminology, and Emerging Applications.
Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- I speak Tele outlines the design of a digitized dysarthria assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transforming Speech-Language Pathology with AI: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Guidelines.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Based Identification of Phonological Biomarkers for Speech Sound Disorders in Saudi Arabic-Speaking Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.Stroke · 2025Article
- An AI Tutorial for Speech and Language Therapists: Translating Concepts From the AI Literature Into Accessible Knowledge and Clinically Relevant Applications.International journal of language & communication disordersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to orient both clinicians and researchers to machine learning (ML) approaches as applied to the field of speech-language pathology. We first introduce key ML concepts and terminology and proceed to feature exemplar papers of recent work utilizing ML techniques in speech-language pathology. We also discuss the limitations, cautions, and challenges to the implementation of ML and related techniques in speech-language pathology. Conclusions: Readers are introduced to broad ML concepts, including common ML tasks (e.g., classification, regression), and specific types of ML models (e.g., linear/logistic regression, random forest, support vector machines, neural networks). Key considerations for developing, evaluating, validating, and interpreting ML models are discussed. An application section reviews six exemplar published papers in the aphasiology literature that have utilized ML approaches. Lastly, limitations to the implementation of ML approaches are discussed, including issues of reliability, validity, bias, and explainability. We highlight emergent solutions and next steps to facilitate responsible and clinically meaningful use of ML approaches in speech-language pathology moving forward.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.