Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785943›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Small but high risk: a 10-year single-hospital study on sharp gastrointestinal foreign bodies-the case of the jujube pit.

Liangliang Xue, Dongqiang Guo, Jihu Chen, Shuyan Liu, Yaqi Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liangliang XueDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Dongqiang GuoDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Jihu ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Shuyan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Yaqi ShenDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Guidelines from Europe and the United States concur that sharp foreign bodies (FBs) whose length exceeds 2.5 cm seldom traverse the pylorus and are associated with serious complications. To determine whether jujube pits conform to this rule, we investigated the clinical course of patients with jujube pit impaction, characterized the patient populations at greatest risk, and compared the diagnostic performance of barium esophagography (BE) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on cases of jujube pit impaction treated from January 2014 to June 2024. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical data were collected and analyzed. The ingestion-to-diagnosis interval was collected in patients diagnosed via MDCT. The impaction sites of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and diagnosis date of the event were recorded for both BE and MDCT. The length and width of the jujube pit were measured on MDCT imaging, and interobserver agreement was assessed via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The performance of BE and MDCT in diagnosing subphrenic impaction and perforation was compared, with the surgical findings serving as the reference. Results: Of the 1,680 patients diagnosed via BE, 599 (35.7%) required endoscopic extraction, while of the 184 cases diagnosed by MDCT, 32 (17.4%) required this procedure. Admission for this condition clustered in the May-July period-peak season for jujube-filled zongzi (BE: 853/1,680, 50.8%; MDCT: 80/184, 43.5%). BE showed most pits lodged in the cervical (n=644) or upper thoracic esophagus (n=934). Perforations were confirmed intraoperatively in 27 of 32 patients-almost all subphrenic-with pits length shorter than 25 mm responsible for 18 of these cases. The length of jujube pits ranged from 1.4 to 3.5 cm (ICC =0.990), and the impaction site and length were not correlated. Contrary to guideline assertions, pits <25 mm accounted for 66.7% (18/27) of perforations, with the most being located in the small intestine. Conclusions: Jujube pit impaction peaks around the Dragon Boat Festival, and MDCT outperforms BE in detecting subphrenic pits and perforations. The impaction site and perforation risk are independent of jujube length, but shorter pits (<25 mm) are more likely to perforate the small intestine, as these double-pointed, broad fragments flip and wedge between mucosal folds. Given that no pit size is "safe" and public awareness remains low, primary prevention through dietary education is imperative.

Indexed as

barium esophagography (BE)computed tomographyforeign body (FB)Gastrointestinal tract (GI tract)impaction

Identifiers

PMID40785943
PMCPMC12332571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.