Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785929›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Prospective evaluation of arterial spin labeling and diffusion tensor imaging-magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.

Jiali Ma, Changhao Cao, Chenqin Que, Jiayi Wan, Linkun Hu, Jie Li, Yixing Yu, Peng Wu, Chunhong Hu, Lingjie Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiparametric MR Imaging for Evaluating Renal Function and Microstructure.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiali Ma *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Changhao Cao *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chenqin QueDepartment of Medical Technology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Jiayi WanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Linkun HuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Medical Imaging (Science), Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yixing YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Peng WuPhilips Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Chunhong HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lingjie WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Mo ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-2389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal management strategy for end-stage renal disease is renal transplantation, graft function must be monitored regularly postoperatively. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the value of combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with laboratory parameters in assessing chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), and to compare whether a combined approach was superior to single-parameter indicators. Methods: A total of 86 subjects were enrolled in the study, of whom, 20 had stable renal function, and 66 had biopsy-confirmed CAD. Imaging was performed on a 1.5-T MRI system using T2-weighted imaging, arterial spin labeling (ASL), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 24-hour urinary protein (24hUP), renal blood flow (RBF), and fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the subjects were measured. Correlation analysis was applied to assess MRI parameters' association with eGFR, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of fMRI parameters and clinical parameters for CAD. Results: The subjects were categorized into CAD groups based on their eGFR levels. The control group had higher renal RBF [277.69±67.17 Conclusions: In this study, two multiparametric MRI models (RBF-FA-24hUP-eGFR and RBF-FA-24hUP) were developed and shown to be superior to non-invasive CAD assessment tools. These models outperformed conventional single-parameter methods in diagnosis and moderate-to-severe subgroup stratification. To a certain extent, these models could prevent unnecessary puncture biopsies, and reduce the occurrence of complications such as bleeding and infection. RBF in particular and FA showed utility as non-invasive biomarkers for CAD and risk stratification.

Indexed as

arterial spin labeling (ASL)chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD)diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)Kidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40785929
PMCPMC12332621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.