ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Impact of anatomical variations of the circle of Willis on the blood flow within unruptured intracranial aneurysm.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anatomical variations of the circle of Willis (CoW) are closely associated with the occurrence of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the impact of anatomical variations on the rupture risk of IAs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of artery absence on the internal flow and rupture risk of IAs. Methods: A one-dimensional (1D) solver was combined with a 3-dimensional (3D) fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model to effectively quantify the hemodynamic characteristics inside IA under artery absence. Results: The 1D results showed that the absence of anterior cerebral artery A1 segment (ACA-A1) or posterior cerebral artery P1 segment (PCA-P1) will trigger a compensatory blood flow effect, leading to significant blood flow variations of the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) and internal carotid artery (ICA). By FSI calculation, in the absence of ACA-A1, the maximum wall shear stress (WSS) within the ACoA aneurysm increased by 103% or more compared to the complete CoW due to blood inflow jet. In addition, WSS increased by 45% and 12% in the contralateral ICA and posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysm respectively, whereas it decreased by 33% and 35% in the ipsilateral ICA and PCoA aneurysm, respectively. The absence of PCA-P1 had a less significant impact on the global blood flow of the CoW compared to the absence of ACA-A1, but it still led to an increase in WSS within the ipsilateral ICA and PCoA aneurysms (25% and 22%, respectively). Conclusions: The absence of ACA-A1 or PCA-P1 may serve as an IA rupture risk factor. If ACA-A1 or PCA-P1 absence is identified clinically alongside an aneurysm, proactive treatment strategies are advised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.