Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785884›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Dual-phase multiobjective Bayesian optimization method for estimating hepatocellular carcinoma dynamics parameters from PET/CT scans.

Xin Xiong, Jingchun Huang, Siming Li, Jianfeng He, Shaobo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin XiongFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Kunming, China.
Jingchun HuangFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0645-2042
Siming LiFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Kunming, China.
Jianfeng HeFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Kunming, China.
Shaobo WangPET/CT Center, Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimization algorithms provide robust analytical frameworks for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pharmacokinetics based on dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the role of estimating HCC pharmacokinetics from PET/ CT scans via the Bayesian optimization (BO) method and the dual-phase (DP) and multiobjective (MO) strategies into BO (DPMO-BO) method. Methods: Five-minute dynamic and one-minute static PET/CT imaging data derived from 27 HCC tumors were used to estimate kinetic parameters Results: The results demonstrated that the BM significantly distinguished HCC from background liver tissues with Conclusions: The BO method can be used to assess HCC pharmacokinetics, whereas the DPMO-BO method further enhances diagnostic performance by achieving improved fitting accuracy.

Indexed as

Bayesian optimization (BO)hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Kinetic modelspositron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)

Identifiers

PMID40785884
PMCPMC12332710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.