ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Image-guided cryoablation for uterine diseases: a systematic review.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cryoablation is a minimally invasive treatment, with limited research on uterine diseases. This paper provides a review of image-guided cryoablation for the treatment of gynecologic diseases, such as uterine myoma, abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) and adenomyoma, from a safety and efficacy perspective. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science. 2 researchers were responsible for identifying relevant studies. 18 studies that reported outcomes of image-guided cryoablation in gynecologic conditions were included. The baseline characteristics of patients and the clinical outcomes of cryoablation were all assessed. The different types of uterine pathology were discussed separately and the data were statistically analyzed independently to avoid the influence of methodological heterogeneity on the results to the greatest extent possible. Results: Mean volume reduction of uterine myoma was 69.8% at 24 months after cryoablation; the initial ablation efficiency rate of AWE was 82% per patient and 93.6% per AWE lesion; and the mean volume reduction of adenomyoma at 12 months was 65.8%. A significant decrease in visual analogue score (VAS) from baseline was reported in all included studies for patients with the 3 aforementioned uterine diseases following cryoablation. Eleven studies reported postoperative complications, with major complications occurring in an average of 3.82% of patients. During follow-up, less than 10% of patients had residual symptoms or lesions. Conclusions: Image-guided cryoablation is a minimally invasive therapy for uterine diseases with statistically and clinically significant effectiveness and a low incidence of major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.