ArticleCirculation reports2025
Prefectural Survey on Anthracycline-Related Cardiomyopathy at the Start of the Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control Programs - Phase 4.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists was recommended as part of Japan's Basic Plan to Promote Disease Control Programs in 2023. We evaluated the extent of this collaboration regarding anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy (ARCM). Methods and Results: Self-administered questionnaires on ARCM were distributed to all cardiologists and leading oncologists in hospitals across the Niigata Prefecture. Overall, 126 cardiologists and 41 leading oncologists from 29 hospitals responded to the survey. Clinical experience with ARCM was reported by 76.2% of cardiologists and 58.5% of leading oncologists (P=0.044). Guideline recommendations for the early detection and treatment of ARCM were known by 89.1% of cardiologists and 87.8% of leading oncologists. Among the 20 hospitals providing chemotherapy, 12 (60%) had matching answers for 'post-event consultation' or 'pre-event consultation' between the cardiology and oncology departments. Regarding 'pre-event consultation', 4 hospitals had consistent responses for the most proactive response, whereas only 1 hospital had consistent responses from both departments for the majority response. The agreement of responses between the 2 departments was significant for the most proactive response (k=0.485; P=0.005), but not for the majority response (k=0.059; P=0.675). Conclusions: The importance of early detection and treatment of ARCM was understood at the individual level; however, increased emphasis on 'pre-event consultation' is necessary to establish an interdepartmental early detection system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.