Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785766›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025

The Impact of Critical Shoulder Angle during Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Is It Helpful?

Sung-Min Rhee, Jung Youn Kim, Geun Wu Chang, Joon Woo Lee, Yong Girl Rhee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sung-Min RheeShoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-4219
Jung Youn KimShoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-6525
Geun Wu ChangShoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-3787
Joon Woo LeeShoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-0435
Yong Girl RheeShoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-0216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgroud: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is an important radiologic measurement that is significantly associated with deltoid and rotator cuff biomechanics. It was hypothesized that the CSA affects the biomechanics of the shoulder joint before and after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Methods: One hundred and fifty-six patients (156 shoulders) who underwent RTSA with medial glenoid/lateral humerus design were divided into 3 groups according to preoperative CSA: low CSA group (< 30°), intermediate CSA group (30°-35°), and high CSA group (> 35°). The preoperative and postoperative lateral humeral offset (LHO) and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and postoperative deltoid wrapping angle (DWA) and deltoid moment arm (DMA) were measured on x-ray and computed tomography and compared between the 3 groups. The improvement of the pain score, assessed using the visual analog scale at rest and motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score, and Constant shoulder score were compared between the 3 groups. Results: The postoperative LHO was the highest in the low CSA group (16.62 ± 4.76 mm) and the smallest in the high CSA group (13.68 ± 5.59 mm, Conclusions: RTSA with lateralized humeral design in patients with a low CSA resulted in more lateralization and distalization than in patients with an intermediate or high CSA, although the difference was less than 5 mm. The imaging and postoperative improvement in clinical outcomes associated with deltoid action such as range of motion, DWA, and DMA were not significantly different between patients with different CSAs. Therefore, the CSA is not useful in the selection of humeral components during RTSA, since there is no significant difference in clinical or functional outcomes based on CSA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder JointAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCenter of rotationCritical shoulder angleDeltoid moment armDeltoid wrapping angleReverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40785766
PMCPMC12328119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.