ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Anatomic Morphometry of the Coracoid Process and Lateral Clavicle for Management of Glenoid Bone Loss: A 3-Dimensional Analysis in a Korean Population.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which radiological parameters of the coracoid process influence the diagnosis of atraumatic subscapularis tears? Systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Coracoid process morphometry in Asians: a systematic review of computed tomography-based studies.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Review
- Adolescent coracoid morphology: a computed tomography morphometric analysis of growth across age groups.JSES international · 2026Article
- Which Technique is the Optimal Option for the Treatment of Displaced Far-Lateral (Cho Type IIC) Distal Clavicle Fractures? A Comparative Analysis of Coracoclavicular Fixation Versus Anatomical Locking Plate Fixation.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: Proper sizing of the coracoid is an important factor when using the Latarjet procedure. However, several studies have reported that the Asian coracoid may not be large enough for the Latarjet. A distal clavicle has recently been suggested as a locally available osteoarticular graft for restoring glenoid bone loss. The objective of this study was to examine the anatomic morphometry of the coracoid and distal clavicle in the Korean population. Methods: A total of 66 cadaveric coracoids and clavicles (32 men and 34 women) underwent continuous 1.0-mm slice computed tomography (CT) scans. CT images were imported into Mimics software for reconstruction of a 3-dimensional model of the coracoid process and clavicle. The length, width, and height of the coracoid process were measured. In addition, the width and height within 10 mm of the lateral end of the clavicle were also measured. Analysis of correlation between measured parameters and demographics data was performed. Results: The mean length of the coracoid was 19.2 ± 2.0 mm, the width of the coracoid was 15.5 ± 1.7 mm, and the height of the coracoid was 11.5 ± 1.6 mm. The width and height of the 10 mm point of the clavicle were 22.1 ± 3.7 mm and 12.0 ± 1.8 mm, respectively. The results showed that women had smaller measurements than men in all parameters ( Conclusions: The morphologies of the coracoid process and the distal clavicle showed significant correlations with sex and height. The coracoid length tends to be smaller in Asians than Caucasians, thus, the distal clavicle might be a suitable option for reconstruction of instability-related glenoid bone loss in the Asian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.