ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2025
Preoperative decompression for left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: a comparative study between a stent and a decompression tube.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStents and decompression tubes (DTs) are both commonly utilized for preoperative decompression in patients with left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). However, the comparative effectiveness and oncological safety of these 2 approaches remain uncertain.
aimThe aim of this study was to compare clinical performance and long-term oncological outcomes of preoperative stent and DT insertion in patients with left-sided OCRC. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included 87 consecutive patients, diagnosed with left-sided OCRC between January 2022 and December 2024. All patients underwent preoperative decompression using either a stent or a DT. Clinical decompression efficacy, surgical outcomes, and oncological parameters were compared between the groups.
resultsAmong the 87 patients enrolled, 45 received a stent and 42, a DT. Technical success rates were similar between the groups (stent, 95.6% vs DT, 97.6%; P >0.99), as were clinical success rates (stent, 88.9% vs DT, 90.5%; P >0.99). Perforation occurred in 3 patients (6.7%) in the stent group and 1 participant (2.4%) in the DT group (P = 0.62). Primary anastomosis was achieved in 84.4% of the stent patients and 81% of the DT patients (P = 0.67). Median disease-free survival was 32 (21-43) months in the stent group and 34 (25-43) months in the DT group (P = 0.35), while median overall survival was 38 (29-47) and 39 (34-44) months, respectively (P = 0.53), with no apparent differences between the groups.
conclusionsBoth stent and DT insertion are safe and effective strategies for preoperative left-sided OCRC management. No significant differences in either short-term clinical outcomes or long-term oncological results were observed between the 2 methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.