ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2025
Multicenter comparative analysis of preoperative and postoperative outcomes after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate based on the prostate volume.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RIRS vs PCNL in treating lower-pole renal stones: a comparative clinical outcome study.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate vs bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in moderate-to-large prostates: perioperative and functional outcomes.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHolmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is considered the best treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This procedure offers effective symptom relief across varying prostate sizes.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate preoperative and postoperative outcomes of HoLEP in patients with different prostate volumes in a multicenter comparative analysis conducted in Jordan. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cohort study was conducted in 3 private clinics in Amman, Jordan. It included 77 patients who were divided into 2 groups according to prostate volume: smaller than or equal to 40 ml (n = 37) and larger than 40 ml (n = 40). The data collected preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively included urinary symptoms, quality of life (QoL) scores, and functional parameters. Statistical analyses included paired
resultsBoth groups exhibited improvements in relation to initial values, as assessed after the procedure using the International Prostate Symptom Score (≤40 ml, 16 vs 7.6; >40 ml, 14.9 vs 4.6;
conclusionsHoLEP effectively improved various measured parameters, including urinary symptoms, QoL, and functional outcomes in patients with BPH across all prostate sizes. Larger prostates required procedures of increased complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.