ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2024
Effective Pruning for Top-k Feature Search on the Basis of SHAP Values.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Machine Learning Classification Predictions through SHAP and Features Analysis Interpretation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the ever-increasing influence of machine learning models, it has become necessary to explain their predictions. The SHAP framework provides a solution to this problem by assigning a score to each feature of a model such that it reflects the feature contribution to the prediction. Although SHAP is widely used, it is hampered by its computational cost when preserving model-agnosticism. This paper proposes a model-agnostic algorithm, TopShap, to efficiently approximate the SHAP values of the top-k most important features. TopShap uses confidence interval bounds of the approximate SHAP values to determine on the fly which features can no longer be part of the top-k and then removes them from the computation, thus saving computational resources. This cost reduction makes TopShap better suited than competing model-agnostic methods for top-k SHAP value computation. The evaluation of TopShap shows that it performs efficient pruning of the feature search space, in turn leading to a substantial reduction in the execution time when compared to the existing most efficient agnostic approach, Kernel SHAP. The experiments presented in this work cover a wide range of numbers of features and instances, using the following public datasets: Concrete, Wine quality, Appliances energy, PBMC gene expression, Mercedes, CT locations, and a synthetic regression. Various models were used to demonstrate model-agnosticism:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.