Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785630›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2025

Improvement of autochthonous Saccharomyces cerevisiae by rapid laboratory evolution technique of genome shuffling.

Ravichandra Hospet, Devarajan Thangadurai, Jeyabalan Sangeetha, Natália Cruz-Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ravichandra HospetDepartment of Botany, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1900-483X
Devarajan ThangaduraiDepartment of Botany, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Jeyabalan SangeethaDepartment of Environmental Science, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Natália Cruz-MartinsDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of selecting indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains as a starter culture for specific fermentation has several requisites, including the assessment of distinct parameters based on desirable and traditional enological criteria. In most wineries, commercial S. cerevisiae strains are used for wine fermentation. However, it is rare to find indigenous S. cerevisiae strains used in wine production, even though these isolates are better adapted to specific regions and are often preferred for producing local fruit wines. Here, the identification and characterization of indigenous S. cerevisiae were carried out by 28S rRNA sequencing, followed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis for further confirmation. The strain improvement technique of genome shuffling was incorporated to ameliorate sugar tolerance and enhance alcohol production in the S. cerevisiae RHTD10 strain. As a result, it was observed that the improved strain from the third round of shuffling tolerated sugar stress of 30% and produced 10.14 ± 0.21% of alcohol, which is higher than the wild strain of 7.11 ± 0.22% alcohol.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionDNA ShufflingGenome, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeWineEthanolFermentationEthanolalcohol productiongenome shufflingSaccharomyces cerevisiaestrain ameliorationsugar tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40785630
PMCPMC12599290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.