Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785575›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025

Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin.

Ellie Leong, Christina E Geddes, Fiona Weeks, Megan L Kavanaugh

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellie LeongSenior Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA. Correspondence: eleong@guttmacher.org.ORCID 0009-0004-7686-8743
Christina E GeddesSenior Research Assistant, formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3747-9338
Fiona WeeksResearcher, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-6706
Megan L KavanaughPrincipal Research Scientist, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9888-4304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care is key for people to realise their reproductive goals, but sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients may experience different barriers or facilitators to access than their non-SGM counterparts. We analysed a panel dataset of 900 patients using publicly funded SRH services in Wisconsin in 2020-2023 and constructed conditional logistic regression models to explore barriers to contraceptive services and subsequent patient-centred contraceptive method use, stratified by SGM status. Experience of barriers to wanted contraception was strongly related to preferred contraceptive use (aOR = 0.36, CI: 0.20-0.64,

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityReproductive Health ServicesSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedWisconsinYoung Adultbarriers to carecontraceptioncontraceptive accessinequities in health carepreferred contraceptive use

Identifiers

PMID40785575
PMCPMC12434849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.