Observational studyAmerican journal of hematology2025
Characterization of Breakthrough Hemolysis in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: An International Multicenter Experience.
Observational study in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Terminal Blockade: A Mechanism-Based Approach to Complement Inhibitor Selection in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria with a positive Coombs test presenting as acute kidney injury: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of Breakthrough Hemolysis in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: An International Multicenter Experience.American journal of hematology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) is defined as a hemolytic exacerbation in a patient with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) treated with complement inhibitors (CIs). In the current era of several terminal and proximal inhibitors, there are no guidelines for defining BTH and its severity, and clinical management is not standardized. This retrospective, observational, and multicentric study evaluated BTH frequency and severity in PNH patients treated with complement inhibitors from 2007 until February 2025 at 10 centers across Italy (9 centers) and the United Kingdom (1 center). A total of 271 BTH events occurred in 102 out of 198 patients (51%), with 36/198 (18%) patients experiencing 3 or more BTH episodes over the 18-year follow-up. Most events (55%) were prompted by infections, and 24 (10%) were linked to poor compliance with oral alternative pathway inhibitors. BTH was clinically severe in about half of patients, requiring transfusion in 46%, CI dosing adjustment in 17%, and anticoagulant prophylaxis in 16%. Overall, 5 (2%) breakthrough thrombotic events occurred in patients not on prophylaxis, all during an infection. BTH incidence was 0.19 events per patient-year, maximal with proximal inhibitors (0.4 events per patient-year), and lower for anti-C5 (0.18 per patient-year). By logistic regression analysis, the main predictors of BTH were more severe disease at diagnosis (increased LDH and a shorter time to first complement inhibitor), treatment with proximal inhibitors, and poorer EBMT response category.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.