Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785513›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Can unvaccinated children be reached through mobile phones? Analyses of national cross-sectional surveys from 70 countries.

Francine S Costa, Thiago M Santos, Larissa An Silva, Tewodaj Mengistu, Taylor A Holroyd, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio Jd Barros, Cesar G Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francine S CostaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Thiago M SantosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Larissa An SilvaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Tewodaj MengistuGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Taylor A HolroydGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel R HoganGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aluisio Jd BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interventions using mobile phones, otherwise known as mHealth interventions, are increasingly being used in low- and middle-income countries to remind families about scheduled child immunisations. Despite this, few studies examined impact on zero-dose children - those who failed to receive a single dose of a routine vaccine. As disparities in mobile phone ownership may limit the effectiveness of mHealth interventions, we assessed associations between mobile phone ownership, gender, wealth, residence, and zero-dose and modelled their potential impact for reaching unvaccinated children. Methods: We analysed 70 nationally representative surveys with data on immunisations and mobile phone ownership by households and mothers, and correlated ownership with household wealth and place of residence. We performed analyses at the individual child level and pooled across all countries weighted by national populations. We modelled the mHealth interventions' potential impact on zero-dose prevalence by estimating how many unvaccinated children are reachable via mobile phones. Results: The surveys included 163 527 children aged 12-23 months, with 13.4% being zero-dose. Among them, 34% of mothers and 73% of households had a mobile phone, compared to 60% and 89% for vaccinated children. Mobile phone ownership by mothers ranged from 32% in the poorest to 86% in the wealthiest quintile. A hypothetical 100% effective intervention using household mobile phones would reduce zero-dose prevalence from 13% to 4%, while one using similar effectiveness assumptions for mothers' phones would reduce national prevalence to 10%. Interventions with effectiveness ranging from 10% to 50% would lead to smaller impact levels. The largest impact is expected in countries like Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire, where both zero-dose prevalence and mobile phone ownership are high. Conclusions: The potential impact of mHealth interventions for reaching zero-dose children may be limited by mobile phone ownership among mothers and families, particularly among the poor, where we find the greatest number of unvaccinated children.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneReminder SystemsVaccinationCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMothersOwnershipSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40785513
PMCPMC12336926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.