Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785488›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Tumor Size Models Based on Erlotinib Clinical Data in Advanced NSCLC.

Anna Mishina, Kirill Zhudenkov, Gabriel Helmlinger, Kirill Peskov

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00364351 (A Phase III, International, Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of Zactima™ Versus Tarceva® in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00364351 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, International, Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of Zactima™ Versus Tarceva® in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyRan2006 to 2016Enrolled1,574ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung CancerArmsVandetanib, Erlotinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna MishinaResearch Center of Model-Informed Drug Development, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-9444-4324
Kirill ZhudenkovResearch Center of Model-Informed Drug Development, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2991-6189
Gabriel HelmlingerQuantitative Medicines, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4925-2463
Kirill PeskovResearch Center of Model-Informed Drug Development, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0678-5729

Funding

Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)Modeling & Simulation Decisions FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early assessment of efficacy and dose optimization remain critical challenges in the development of anticancer therapies. Empirical models of solid tumor size dynamics-a key prognostic biomarker-have played a central role in addressing these challenges. However, a systematic comparison of commonly used tumor size models, in terms of descriptive and predictive performance as well as generalizability within a population framework, has not been conducted to date. The present research sought to develop a methodological framework for the optimization of tumor models, offering a basis for more accurate predictions of tumor dynamics. The corresponding modeling workflow was practically tested against clinical data of erlotinib, a treatment administered to patients with advanced NSCLC. Five widely used tumor size models were evaluated, of which only three-the Bi-Exponential (BiExp), the Linear-Exponential (LExp), and Claret's Tumor Growth Inhibition (TGI) model-demonstrated reproducibility of the base model during a repeated cross-validation approach. Among these, the TGI model exhibited superior descriptive and predictive performance. However, a thorough literature search showed that erlotinib clinical data in NSCLC have been analyzed using only the BiExp and LExp models. Furthermore, extrapolation from 3 to 16 months revealed outlier predictions for the BiExp and TGI models, while the LExp model showed higher consistency, suggesting that models utilizing an exponential growth function may have a more limited extrapolation range than those assuming linear growth. Despite a clear ranking of models based on descriptive and predictive performance, no hierarchy emerged with respect to discriminatory ability. All three models showed high accuracy in distinguishing RECIST-based objective responders, while accuracy in predicting the emergence of acquired resistance remained uniformly low. Trial Registration: Clinical trial number: NCT00364351.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErlotinib HydrochlorideLung NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalProtein Kinase InhibitorsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsTumor BurdenAntineoplastic AgentsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase Inhibitorserlotiniblung cancermathematical modelpopulation modelingtargeted therapytumor size

Identifiers

PMID40785488
PMCPMC12706410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.