Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785301›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025

Comparison of Frequency-Specific Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulations on Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Seungchan Park, Gwan Gyu Lee, Jiheon Kim, Do Hoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seungchan ParkMind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Gwan Gyu LeeMind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Jiheon KimMind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Do Hoon KimMind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Hallym UniversityMinistry of EducationNational Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1I1A3058026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effects of theta and gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cognitive function and memory in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsThe participants were assigned to one of three conditions: sham, theta (5 Hz), or gamma (40 Hz) tACS, targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for approximately 30 min. Cognitive tasks were conducted before and after stimulation, including the Digit Span and Trail Making Test A (TMT-A).

resultsThe results indicated significant improvements in the gamma tACS group, specifically a reduction in TMT-A errors. In contrast, no significant effects were observed in the sham or theta groups.

conclusionThese findings suggest that gamma tACS enhances working memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility, potentially due to its modulating neural activity within the DLPFC and restoring effective theta-gamma coupling. Conversely, theta tACS did not yield improvements, likely because of the elevated baseline theta levels and disrupted oscillatory dynamics observed in patients with MCI. This study underscores the potential of gamma tACS as a promising intervention for cognitive decline in MCI and further suggests the necessity of a comprehensive approach that considers the electrophysiological abnormalities and dynamic oscillatory patterns in MCI.

Indexed as

DementiaMild cognitive impairmentTranscranial alternating current stimulationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID40785301
PMCPMC12444202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.