ArticlePhysiologia plantarum
Processing Tomato Responses to Plant-Based Biostimulants Are Modulated by Environmental Conditions.
Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fermented Kiwifruit By-Product as Experimental Biostimulant for Soilless Mini-Plum Tomato Cultivation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Processing Tomato Responses to Plant-Based Biostimulants Are Modulated by Environmental Conditions.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.), rich in health-promoting bioactive compounds, are vital to the economy and culture of Mediterranean regions such as southern Italy. However, open-field cultivation in these areas faces increasing challenges due to fluctuating environmental conditions, which intensify oxidative stress, accelerate ripening, and compromise yield and quality. Plant-based protein hydrolysates (PHs) and optimized irrigation practices have emerged as promising strategies to enhance crop resilience. This study assessed the effects of two foliar-applied biostimulants: MU, a seaweed and plant amino acid-based formulation, and SR, a potassium-rich botanical extract. Both were tested on tomatoes (cv. "H1534") under open-field conditions in southern Italy (Foggia) over two seasons (2019-2020). Both biostimulants had no significant impact on yield traits or technological quality, whereas year-to-year variability markedly influenced outcomes. In 2020, compared with 2019, total yield declined by 45%, and defective fruits rose by 311%.°Brix, polyphenols, lycopene, and sweetness index also decreased significantly (-41%, -18%, -58%, and -14%, respectively), indicating stress conditions. Under these circumstances, MU increased polyphenols (+27%) and enhanced essential (+42%) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs, +63%), while SR also stimulated BCAAs accumulation (+30%). These findings suggest that, under variable open-field conditions, biostimulants mainly influenced fruit metabolic profiles rather than directly enhancing growth or yield. Their performance appears closely tied to environmental factors, reinforcing the need for realistic, context-specific evaluations to guide their effective integration into sustainable cropping systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.