Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785233›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology journal2025

AI-Driven Quality Monitoring and Control in Stem Cell Cultures: A Comprehensive Review.

Rohan Singh, Hamid Ebrahimi Orimi, Praveen Kumar Raju Pedabaliyarasimhuni, Corinne A Hoesli, Moncef Chioua

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohan SinghDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4884-8866
Hamid Ebrahimi OrimiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Praveen Kumar Raju PedabaliyarasimhuniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Corinne A HoesliDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Moncef ChiouaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in stem cell research forge them into one of the most promising sources for cell therapy applications. Quality monitoring in stem cell culture is essential for ensuring consistency, viability, and therapeutic efficacy. Traditional methods involve periodic sampling for conducting endpoint assays such as cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation using microscopy and flow cytometry, which are labor-intensive and often lack the real-time monitoring of the processes for scale-up applications. This paper explores artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches for real-time quality control, integrating machine vision, predictive modeling, and sensor-based monitoring. AI models analyze high-resolution imaging and multi-sensor data to dynamically track critical quality attributes (CQAs), including cell morphology, proliferation rate, differentiation potential, environmental stability (pH, oxygen, and nutrient levels), genetic integrity, and contamination risks. These models enable automated anomaly detection, differentiation tracking, and adaptive culture optimization. By leveraging real-time feedback systems and multi-omics integration, AI-driven techniques enhance scalability, reproducibility, and process automation in stem cell biomanufacturing. This review outlines current advancements, challenges, and future directions in AI-assisted quality monitoring and highlights its potential to improve fully automated, scalable production of stem cell lines for clinical translation and regulatory compliance in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCell Culture TechniquesStem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansQuality Controlartificial intelligencepredictive modelingquality monitoringreal‐time feedbackstem cell culture

Identifiers

PMID40785233
PMCPMC12336434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.