Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785132›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?

John Read, Lucy Johnstone, Sarah Price Hancock, Chris Harrop, Lisa Morrison, Sue Cunliffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John ReadDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-1192
Lucy JohnstoneClinical Psychologist and Independent Researcher, Bristol, UK.
Sarah Price HancockIonic Injury Foundation, San Diego, USA.
Chris HarropClinical Psychologist and Independent Researcher, Woking, UK.
Lisa MorrisonLisa Morrison Training and Consultancy, Belfast, UK.
Sue CunliffeIndependent Researcher, Worcester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last placebo-controlled ECT trial for depression occurred in 1985. While awaiting trials that meet today's standards of evidence-based medicine, this paper presents the responses, to an online survey, of 858 ECT recipients and 286 family members and friends, from 44 countries, on five effectiveness measures. The majority (55%-71%) reported either no benefit or a negative outcome on the five measures. The percentages reporting some benefit were: helped the specific problem for which ECT was given-45%; improved mood-41%; generally 'helpful'-41%; improved 'quality of life'-29%; reduced suicidality-33%. Respondents were, unusually, given the option, on four of these measures, to report that the variable had been made worse. The results were: specific problem made worse-37%; worse mood-29%; reduced quality of life-62%; and increased suicidality-19%. The findings were consistent with responses from family and friends. It is striking that nearly half (49%) reported that their quality of life was made 'much worse' (22%) or 'very much worse' (27%) by ECT. A partial explanation of this alarming outcome is that quality of life encompasses the adverse effects of ECT alongside any benefits. In conjunction with the absence of evidence that ECT is more effective than placebo, and the known long-term adverse effects on memory, these survey findings lead us to recommend a suspension of ECT in clinical settings pending independent large-scale placebo-controlled studies to determine whether ECT has any effectiveness relative to placebo, against which the many serious adverse effects can be weighed.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapyFamilyFriendsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultefficacyelectroconulsive therapypatient surveyshock therapy

Identifiers

PMID40785132
PMCPMC12336435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.