Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785107›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025

Gastrointestinal bleeding detection on digital subtraction angiography using convolutional neural networks with and without temporal information.

Derek Smetanick, Sailendra Naidu, Alex Wallace, M-Grace Knuttinen, Indravadan Patel, Sadeer Alzubaidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derek SmetanickThe University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Interventional Radiology, Tucson, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7885-6796
Sailendra NaiduMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-8464
Alex WallaceMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5383-1375
M-Grace KnuttinenMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5772-119X
Indravadan PatelMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-0850
Sadeer AlzubaidiMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-170X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDigital subtraction angiography (DSA) offers a real-time approach to locating lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, many sources of bleeding are not easily visible on angiograms. This investigation aims to develop a machine learning tool that can locate GI bleeding on DSA prior to transarterial embolization.

methodsAll mesenteric artery angiograms and arterial embolization DSA images obtained in the interventional radiology department between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2021, were analyzed. These images were acquired using fluoroscopy imaging systems (Siemens Healthineers, USA). Thirty-nine unique series of bleeding images were augmented to train two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) residual neural networks (ResUNet++) for image segmentation. The 2D ResUNet++ network was trained on 3,548 images and tested on 394 images, whereas the 3D ResUNet++ network was trained on 316 3D objects and tested on 35 objects. For each case, both manually cropped images focused on the GI bleed and uncropped images were evaluated, with a superimposition post-processing (SIPP) technique applied to both image types.

resultsBased on both quantitative and qualitative analyses, the 2D ResUNet++ network significantly outperformed the 3D ResUNet++ model. In the qualitative evaluation, the 2D ResUNet++ model achieved the highest accuracy across both 128 × 128 and 256 × 256 input resolutions when enhanced with the SIPP technique, reaching accuracy rates between 95% and 97%. However, despite the improved detection consistency provided by SIPP, a reduction in Dice similarity coefficients was observed compared with models without post-processing. Specifically, the 2D ResUNet++ model combined with SIPP achieved a Dice accuracy of only 80%. This decline is primarily attributed to an increase in false positive predictions introduced by the temporal propagation of segmentation masks across frames.

conclusionBoth 2D and 3D ResUNet++ networks can be trained to locate GI bleeding on DSA images prior to transarterial embolization. However, further research and refinement are needed before this technology can be implemented in DSA for real-time prediction. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Automated detection of GI bleeding in DSA may reduce time to embolization, thereby improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionGastrointestinal HemorrhageNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural NetworksEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningConvolutional neural networksdigital subtraction angiographygastrointestinal bleedingimage segmentationinterventional radiologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40785107
PMCPMC12417900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.