Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785014›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated weed and crop recognition and classification model using deep transfer learning with optimization algorithm.

K Gopalakrishnan, R Sivaraj, M Vijayakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K GopalakrishnanDepartment of Computer Science and Business Systems, Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 641048. gopalakrishnanbtech1@gmail.com.
R SivarajDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Nandha Engineering College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India, 638052.
M VijayakumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sasurie College of Engineering, Vijayamangalam, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu, India, 638056.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weeds and crops contribute to a endless resistance for similar assets, which leads to potential declines in crop production and enlarged agricultural expenses. Conventional models of weed control like extensive pesticide use, appear with the hassle of environmental pollution and advancing weed battle. As the need for organic agricultural and pollutant-free products increases, there is a crucial need for revolutionary solutions. The rise of smart agricultural tools, containing satellite technology, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), and intelligent robots certifies to be paramount in dealing with weed-related challenges. Deep learning (DL) based object detection model has been carried out in numerous applications. As a result, need for instance-level analyses of the weed dataset places constraints on the significance of influential DL methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) led image analysis for weed recognition and mainly, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) utilizing images from cultivated lands have commonly been employed in the literature for identifying numerous kinds of weeds that are cultivated beside crops. This method develops an Automated Weed Recognition and Classification using a Deep Learning Model with Lemrus Optimization (AWRC-DLMLO). The main purpose of the AWRC-DLMLO method is to effectively detect and classify weeds and crop. In the proposed AWRC-DLMLO technique, the main phase of Gaussian filtering (GF) utilizing image pre-processing is implemented to eliminate unwanted noise. The plant segmentation was also developed utilizing the Residual Attention U-Net (RA-UNet) for generating segments. The ShuffleNetV2 approach is exploited in the AWRC-DLMLO method to ascertain feature vector. Next, the lemurs optimization algorithm (LOA) is applied to increase the hyperparameter and fine-tune the DL technique, further enhancing its performance. Eventually, the cascading Q-network (CQN)model is employed for the classification process. To emphasize the improved weed detection performance of the projected AWRC-DLMLO method, a wide range of simulations were done. The extensive outcome highlighted the improvements of the developed AWRC-DLMLO technique with other existing models.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDeep LearningPlant WeedsWeed ControlAgricultureAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningImage pre-processingLemrus optimization algorithmSegmentationTransfer learningWeed recognition

Identifiers

PMID40785014
PMCPMC12336350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.