ArticleScientific reports2025
AI simulation models for diagnosing disabilities in smart electrical prosthetics using bipolar fuzzy decision making based on choquet integral.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of AI simulation models within smart electrical prosthetic systems represents a significant advancement in disability disease diagnosis. However, the selection and evaluation of these AI models interpret some multi-criteria decision-making dilemmas because of the presence of uncertainty and bipolarity (positive and negative aspects) of the selection criteria. Current literature lacks the selection and evaluation of AI simulation models that consider both bipolarity and uncertainty of the criteria, while prevailing Choquet integral aggregation operators despite their strong capabilities for handling information relationships, fail to efficiently process bipolar fuzzy information. The existence of this limitation makes it challenging to identify element interactions and non-linear relationships in uncertain environments containing both positive and negative aspects. To overcome these gaps, first, we develop two operators that are the bipolar fuzzy Choquet integral averaging and bipolar fuzzy Choquet integral geometric operators that uniquely integrate dual aspects (bipolarity) with criterion interaction modeling capabilities, fundamentally differing from traditional fuzzy approaches that cannot simultaneously process dual aspects of criterion. Secondly, we design a new multi-criteria decision-making approach using these operators to assess AI simulation models for prosthetic systems, since the criteria involved such as diagnostic accuracy, computational efficiency, and system reliability, have both positive and negative aspects that need to be considered together. Our method was applied in detail to select AI simulation models for smart electrical prosthetic systems and compared with some prevailing methods and standard Choquet integral approaches. This showed that our method is more precise and produces better evaluation results. It introduces a new theoretical basis for bipolar fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation and offers medical professionals a reliable way to pick the best AI simulation models for important prosthetic applications that influence patient outcomes and the functioning of prosthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.