ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the value of infrared thermal imaging technology in the diagnosis of emergency pulmonary infections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the value of infrared thermal imaging technology in the diagnosis of emergency pulmonary infections. 200 patients who received emergency treatment at our hospital from October 2020 to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects. General information was collected from all patients, including 108 patients with acute pulmonary infection and 92 patients without pulmonary infection. All patients were tested using infrared thermal imaging technology and infrared thermal imaging equipment, with X-ray examination as the gold standard, The chest X-ray scan was performed using an X-ray camera produced by Siemens, and the temperature difference between the affected areas detected by infrared thermal imaging technology in two groups of patients was compared. The detection rate of infrared thermal imaging in the lung infection group was analyzed, and the diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by plotting the ROC curve to calculate the area under the curve. Compared with the uninfected group, the infrared radiation temperature of the infected group was significantly increased in the body surface, chest, abdomen, bilateral lungs, and midpoint of the breasts, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The positive rate of infrared thermal imaging detection in the lung infection group was 93 cases (86.11%), and the positive rate of gold standard X-ray detection was 102 cases (94.44%), the difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05). The AUC value of infrared thermal imaging technology for detecting emergency pulmonary infection patients is 0.933, the sensitivity is 90.36%, the specificity is 92.28%, and the Jordan index is 0.92. Infrared thermography has important applications in the diagnosis of lung infections in emergency medicine.It can reflect the distribution range of abnormal hot spots in patients' lung infections by evaluating temperature changes, and has good diagnostic value in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.