Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784953›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Efficacy of remimazolam in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyun-Su Ri, Soeun Jeon, Jinseok Yeo, Hoon Jung, Christine Kang, Hyojun Choo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Remimazolam: a comprehensive review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyun-Su RiDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7305-4144
Soeun JeonDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea. jseanes@knu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4009-6321
Jinseok YeoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-9955
Hoon JungDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-5221
Christine KangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-9046
Hyojun ChooDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8030-9668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of remimazolam, a newly introduced anesthetic, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to other anesthetics. A systematic search of studies published up to January 2024 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remimazolam with other anesthetics in terms of PONV. Following data synthesis, outcomes were reported as the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of comparator anesthetic. A total of 50 RCTs involving 9,193 participants were included. The results showed no significant difference in PONV incidence between remimazolam and other anesthetic agents (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.13, P = 0.607). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that a lower incidence of overall PONV was associated with remimazolam compared with inhalation anesthetics (n = 363; RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.34-0.73; P < 0.001). Conversely, a higher incidence of postoperative vomiting was associated with remimazolam compared with propofol (n = 3,860; RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.05-1.90; P = 0.024). Overall, there was no significant difference between remimazolam and other anesthetic agents in preventing PONV. However, subgroup analysis revealed that remimazolam was more effective than inhalation anesthetics in mitigating PONV, and it was inferior to propofol in preventing postoperative vomiting.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsBenzodiazepinesPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAnestheticsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnestheticsAntiemeticsBenzodiazepinesremimazolamAnestheticsNauseaPostoperative emesisPostoperative nausea and vomitingRemimazolamVomiting

Identifiers

PMID40784953
PMCPMC12336335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.