Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784945›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025

Addressing reporting heterogeneity in visual analogue scales: a double-index model approach using anchoring vignettes.

Zhiyong Huang, Fabrice Kämpfen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhiyong HuangSouthWestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Fabrice KämpfenSchool of Economics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. fabrice.kampfen@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we propose several methods to account for reporting heterogeneity in self-reported data coming from Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) using corresponding VAS-based anchoring vignettes. Though widely used as a measurement tool in many disciplines, VAS may suffer from reporting heterogeneity. Such reporting heterogeneity and potential solutions to solve this problem in the context of VAS measures have not yet been addressed in the literature. Using VAS-based anchoring vignettes and standard vignettes assumptions, we show how double-index models can be used to address reporting heterogeneity in VAS. We then apply our methods to real data assessing reporting heterogeneity in VAS-measured Quality of Life (QoL) among students in Switzerland. We show that the findings of previous studies showing positive associations between being a female and QoL might be entirely driven by reporting heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementQuality of LifeSelf ReportVisual Analog ScaleAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandMethodQuality of lifeReporting heterogeneityVisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID40784945
PMCPMC12337410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.