Observational studyDysphagia2026
Clinical Predictors of Dysphagia in Acute and Subacute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimal timing of surgical decompression for acute cervical spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Risk Factors associated with dysphagia for people with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (cSCI): A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.Spinal cord · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using the first videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), we aimed to identify clinical predictors of dysphagia in patients with acute and subacute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI). This retrospective chart review included 143 adults, who were diagnosed with TCSCI and underwent their first VFSS between 2018 and 2021. Patients with alert mental status and no history of traumatic brain injury or preexisting conditions causing dysphagia were included. The neurological status was assessed using the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Dysphagia was evaluated using the penetration-aspiration scale and the pharyngeal residue severity rating scale. Cervical alignment was assessed by measuring the O-C2 and C2-C6 angles and the narrowest oropharyngeal diameter. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of dysphagia. Tracheostomy and age ≥ 65 years were identified as significant predictors of dysphagia. Tracheostomy was strongly associated with a higher risk of penetration-aspiration (odds ratio [OR] = 8.33, P = 0.001), whereas age ≥ 65 years was a significant predictor of pharyngeal residue (OR = 4.45, P < 0.001). Despite showing a trend toward significance in univariate analysis, increased cervical lordosis (C2-C6 angle) was not confirmed as an independent predictor in multivariate analysis. Tracheostomy and advanced age are significant early predictors of dysphagia in acute and subacute TCSCI. Early bedside screening, followed by timely instrumental assessment such as VFSS, is essential to detect dysphagia before initiating oral intake and to implement preventive strategies that may reduce aspiration-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.