ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of cervical cancer lymph node metastasis based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics and deep learning features: a dual-center study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary tumor-derived, multiparametric MRI-based deep learning-radiomics-clinical model for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection-Novelty, Trend, or a Paradigm Shift in Surgical Decision-Making for Early Cervical Cancer?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of death from malignant tumors in women, and accurate evaluation of occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) is crucial for optimal treatment. This study aimed to develop several predictive models-including Clinical model, Radiomics models (RD), Deep Learning models (DL), Radiomics-Deep Learning fusion models (RD-DL), and a Clinical-RD-DL combined model-for assessing the risk of OLNM in cervical cancer patients.The study included 130 patients from Center 1 (training set) and 55 from Center 2 (test set). Clinical data and imaging sequences (T1, T2, and DWI) were used to extract features for model construction. Model performance was assessed using the DeLong test, and SHAP analysis was used to examine feature contributions. Results showed that both the RD-combined (AUC = 0.803) and DL-combined (AUC = 0.818) models outperformed single-sequence models as well as the standalone Clinical model (AUC = 0.702). The RD-DL model yielded the highest performance, achieving an AUC of 0.981 in the training set and 0.903 in the test set. Notably, integrating clinical variables did not further improve predictive performance; the Clinical-RD-DL model performed comparably to the RD-DL model. SHAP analysis showed that deep learning features had the greatest impact on model predictions. Both RD and DL models effectively predict OLNM, with the RD-DL model offering superior performance. These findings provide a rapid, non-invasive clinical prediction method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.