ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning and radiomics fusion for predicting the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma within ground glass nodules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A methodological framework for integrating generalisable deep learning and radiomics fusion model for early lung cancer detection across multi-centre imaging datasets.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, deep learning, and hybrid AI for invasiveness stratification of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Development and internal validation of a high-resolution computed tomography radiomics and three-dimensional deep learning diagnostic prediction model for preoperative differentiation of minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in subsolid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A radiomics-based nomogram for preoperatively predicting the invasiveness of nodular lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- FAD-YOLO: a lightweight feature-refined and task-aligned framework for AIS-MIA discrimination on pulmonary CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Radiomics to understand pre-treatment tumor biology for resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- RadioGuide-DCN: A Radiomics-Guided Decorrelated Network for Medical Image Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CT-based intratumoral heterogeneity quantification fusing deep learning radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) require distinct treatment strategies and are associated with different prognoses, underscoring the importance of accurate differentiation. This study aims to develop a predictive model that combines radiomics and deep learning to effectively distinguish between MIA and IAC. In this retrospective study, 252 pathologically confirmed cases of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) were included, with 177 allocated to the training set and 75 to the testing set. Radiomics, 2D deep learning, and 3D deep learning models were constructed based on CT images. In addition, two fusion strategies were employed to integrate these modalities: early fusion, which concatenates features from all modalities prior to classification, and late fusion, which ensembles the output probabilities of the individual models. The predictive performance of all five models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and DeLong's test was performed to compare differences in AUC between models. The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI: 0.684-0.898), while the 2D and 3D deep learning models achieved AUCs of 0.754 (95% CI: 0.594-0.882) and 0.847 (95% CI: 0.724-0.945), respectively, in the testing set. Among the fusion models, the late fusion strategy demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.898 (95% CI: 0.784-0.962), outperforming the early fusion model, which achieved an AUC of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.731-0.936). Although the differences were not statistically significant, the late fusion model yielded the highest numerical values for diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity across all models. The fusion of radiomics and deep learning features shows potential in improving the differentiation of MIA and IAC in GGNs. The late fusion strategy demonstrated promising results, warranting further validation in larger, multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.