ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of systematic nursing on scar appearance following radical thyroidectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Female patients with thyroid cancer have a greater desire for not only curing the disease but also leaving an inconspicuous scar. Systematic nursing has a comprehensive effect on reducing scar formation. However, comprehensive nursing guidance for postoperative scar management are not usually available for patients with thyroid cancer. This study aimed to compare the comprehensive effect of systematic nursing compared to traditional nursing measures on postoperative scar management in patients with thyroid cancer. One hundred patients who underwent radical thyroidectomy between January 2019 and June 2019 were selected and randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in the experimental group (n = 50) received nursing care under systematic nursing guidance, while those in the control group (n = 50) received traditional nursing care. In the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after surgery, all patients returned to the general surgery department for scar evaluation. Scarring was evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Patients' self-evaluated satisfaction scores for scar appearance and nursing guidance were also collected. Compared with the control group, scars in the experimental group were less inconspicuous. At the 6th and 12th months after surgery, the total VSS score in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001). By the 12th month after surgery, patients in the experimental group were more satisfied with the final scar appearance (experimental group: 4.69 ± 0.48; control group: 4.06 ± 0.57; P < 0.01) and nursing care (experimental group: 4.88 ± 0.34; control group: 4.50 ± 0.52; P < 0.05). Systematic nursing guidance had positive effects on reducing scar formation and enhancing patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.