Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784775›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Comparative effectiveness of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone during pregnancy on perinatal and neonatal health outcomes: protocol for a population-based target trial in British Columbia, Canada.

Lindsay A Wilson, Megan Kurz, B Carolina Guerra-Alejos, Jeong Eun Min, Lianping Ti, Bohdan Nosyk

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsay A WilsonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-3338
Megan KurzCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
B Carolina Guerra-AlejosCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jeong Eun MinCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-722X
Lianping TiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bohdan NosykCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada bnosyk@sfu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-3718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy is associated with increased rates of adverse perinatal, foetal and neonatal health events. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) can substantially reduce the risk of these potential harms. In British Columbia (BC), methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone are first-line treatment options for pregnant people with OUD. However, the comparative effectiveness of these regimens during pregnancy remains poorly understood, particularly in terms of how dosage may impact clinical outcomes. This protocol outlines a proposed population-based retrospective study to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of methadone compared with buprenorphine/naloxone during pregnancy on perinatal and neonatal health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We propose to conduct a retrospective observational study using population-based data from individuals who received methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone during pregnancy between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2022. Data will be collected from 10 linked population-level administrative databases. We will emulate target trials using intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. We will use a pooled logistic regression approach to assess the impact of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone on time to OAT episode discontinuation and a dose-response marginal structural model to evaluate neonatal health at delivery. An exploratory observational analysis will also be conducted to describe the impact of methadone vs buprenorphine exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy on congenital malformations and anomalies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been determined to meet the criteria for exemption per Article 2.5 of the 2018 Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Study databases have been made available by the BC Ministries of Health and Mental Health and Addiction as part of the provincial opioid overdose public health emergency response. Results will be disseminated to policymakers, clinical partners, community programmes and people with lived and living experience of substance use and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsAnalgesics, OpioidBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPregnancyPUBLIC HEALTHREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40784775
PMCPMC12336511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.