ArticleBMJ open2025
Prevalence and predisposing factors of retained drug needle fragments in people who inject drugs: a protocol for a preliminary cross-sectional multicentre observational study in Finland.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05679284 (The Prevalence and Predisposing Factors to Retained Drug Needle Fragments in People Who Inject Drugs), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Prevalence and Predisposing Factors to Retained Drug Needle Fragments in People Who Inject Drugs: a Protocol for a Cross-sectional Observational Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNumerous published case reports have described retained drug needle fragments in soft tissue as causes of localised pain and infections in persons who inject drugs (PWIDs). Furthermore, there are case reports of PWIDs with lung and heart embolisations caused by needle emboli. Subcutaneously retained needles also pose a risk of needlestick injury to medical staff. There are no previous epidemiological attempts to evaluate how common X-ray-confirmed retained drug needle fragments are among community-dwelling PWIDs. Due to the unclear clinical relevance of needle fragment retentions, there is a need to systematically evaluate the prevalence of retained needles, related complications and risk factors predisposing needle fragmentations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have planned a prospective cross-sectional study covering multiple ambulatory clinics that manage PWIDs in Tampere, Finland. PWIDs will be asked to give their written informed consent prior to any study procedures. Initially, we aim to recruit a sample for a pilot study of 20 adults (≥18 years) who will be asked to fill out a questionnaire related to their drug use history and their suspicions of having retained needle fragments. Subsequently, participants will undergo X-ray imaging of the injection sites as part of the study. Female participants of childbearing age (<50 years) will undergo urine sample pregnancy testing prior to X-ray imaging. If a needle fragment is found, the participant will be referred to a tertiary centre for consultation at their individual discretion. After the pilot study, we aim to recruit 80 more adult participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We submitted the study protocol for ethics review to the Tampere University Hospital Ethics Committee and received their favourable opinion (study code: R22037). We subsequently sought organisational permission from the clinics to conduct the study. To be enrolled, PWIDs must provide written informed consent. The study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05679284.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.