ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
OncoTrace-TOO: Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Cancer Tissue-of-Origin Identification Using Transcriptomic Signatures.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer of unknown primary: the evolution of tissue of origin identification in the artificial intelligence era.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- OncoTrace-TOO: Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Cancer Tissue-of-Origin Identification Using Transcriptomic Signatures.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer of unknown primary remains a formidable diagnostic challenge due to the inability to pinpoint the primary tumor site, which restricts the use of targeted therapeutics. Although machine-learning methods that integrate transcriptomic approaches have provided valuable insights into tumor origins, they often face challenges in distinguishing biologically similar tumors and typically lack biological interpretability.
aimsThis study aims to develop a transparent and biologically interpretable machine learning framework to accurately classify tissue-of-origin across diverse cancer types, thereby facilitation clinical diagnosis.
methodsWe designed OncoTrace-TOO, a novel tissue-of-origin classification model based on gene expression profiles. The model utilizes pan-cancer discriminative molecular features identified through one-vs-rest differential expression analysis and applies logistic regression as the classification algorithm.
resultsOncoTrace-TOO achieved an overall accuracy of 0.967, with perfect classification for seven cancer types (e.g., CHOL, DLBC, and LAML). The model demonstrated high predictive accuracy in both primary and metastatic cancers across TCGA and GEO validation datasets, with enhanced capability in resolving histologically related malignancies as well as classifying rare cancer subtypes. When applied to independent clinical tumor samples, the model achieved TOO prediction accuracies of 0.857, further validating its robustness. Importantly, the framework offers biologically interpretable predictions by revealing tumor-specific molecular signatures, thus enhancing its clinical applicability.
conclusionsOncoTrace-TOO not only offers high predictive accuracy for tissue-of-origin classification, but also delivers biologically meaningful insights that support clinical decision-making. This framework holds promise for improving diagnostic precision and guiding personalized treatment in challenging cancer cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.