Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784344›Full record

ReviewUrologia internationalis2025

Continuous Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring during Endourological Procedures for Stone Disease: A Canary in the Coalmine for Optimizing Patient Safety.

Naeem Bhojani, Larry E Miller, Samir K Bhattacharyya, Wei Jin Chua, Thomas Tailly, Brian Eisner, Ben H Chew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologia internationalis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naeem BhojaniDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Larry E MillerDepartment of Biostatistics, Miller Scientific, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA.
Samir K BhattacharyyaHealth Economics and Market Access, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA.
Wei Jin ChuaDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Thomas TaillyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Brian EisnerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ben H ChewDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Background: Ureteroscopy is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for treating kidney stones. While ureteroscopy is generally safe and effective, it carries risks of complications that may be associated with elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) during the procedure. This paper discusses the importance of monitoring and managing IRP during endourological procedures to mitigate the risk of complications. Summary: We conducted a review on IRP during endourological procedures, combining systematic and narrative approaches, to examine complications, clinical implications, and IRP monitoring practices. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated strong associations between elevated IRP during endourological procedures and complication risk. Further, cumulative IRP exposure, which considers pressure magnitude and duration, may be a stronger predictor of complication risk than mean or peak IRP values alone. Surveys indicate that while many urologists acknowledge the clinical importance of monitoring and managing IRP, there remains a lack of awareness of real-time IRP monitoring technologies that can alert surgeons to elevated pressures and prompt immediate procedural modifications to mitigate complication risks. Key Messages: Based on current evidence, IRP monitoring should be considered for patients at high risk for pressure-related complications during endourological procedures, which includes a significant proportion of the patient population due to the prevalence of risk factors such as older age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. A coordinated effort across the urological community is recommended to generate additional high-quality data to further our understanding of the potential benefits of real-time monitoring technologies. </p>.

Indexed as

KidneyKidney CalculiMonitoring, IntraoperativePatient SafetyUreteroscopyHumansPressureRisk FactorsEndourologyIntrarenal pressureKidney stoneUreteroscopyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID40784344
PMCPMC12503680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.