ReviewORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties2025
Implications of Intranasal Trigeminal Nerve Function on the Surgical Management of Nasal Obstruction.
Review in ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Background: Surgical interventions for nasal obstruction represent a significant proportion of everyday rhinology practice. Failure to improve patients' symptoms may be due to incomplete assessment of co-morbidities, low sensitivity for nasal airflow, and inadequate therapeutic approaches. This narrative review summarizes the evidence on studies assessing the results of nasal obstruction surgery in relation to trigeminal function measurements. Focus was given to specific procedures such as septoplasty, endoscopic sinus surgery, and surgery of inferior turbinates. Summary: Current literature provides evidence that a significant proportion of patients have decreased intranasal trigeminal function before surgery. Most nasal surgeries conserve trigeminal nerve function, except when more aggressive techniques like inferior turbinate resection or excessive cautery are performed. Key Messages: Trigeminal function should be evaluated in patients presenting with nasal obstruction, especially in the absence of major anatomical blockage. Nasal trigeminal sensitivity may be a contributing factor to perceived obstruction that surgery alone cannot resolve. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.