Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784002›Full record

ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025

Mid- to long-term results of modified tension band technique for small- and medium-sized rotator cuff tears.

Tuğcan Demir, Taner Bekmezci, Halil Karaca, Serkan Aykut, Serdar Kamil Çepni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tuğcan DemirGiresun Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 28200 Giresun, Türkiye. tugcandem@hotmail.com.
Taner Bekmezci
Halil Karaca
Serkan Aykut
Serdar Kamil Çepni

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of the tension-band suture technique for small- and medium-sized rotator cuff tears. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween January 2015 and January 2022, a total of 36 patients (21 males, 15 females; median age: 55 years; range, 35 to 65 years) with small- and medium-sized tears, classified according to Cofield, who were treated with the arthroscopic modified tension-band method were retrospectively analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) shoulder scores, and structural evaluations were conducted via ultrasound. Patient satisfaction was measured using the ASES Index score. Concomitant biceps pathology and the number of anchors used were also recorded.

resultsThe overall median follow-up was 49.9 (range, 22 to 100) months. There was a significant postoperative improvement in functional outcomes, with the median preoperative ASES score of 18.5 (range, 8 to 32) improving to 89 (range, 68 to 100). However, patient satisfaction, as measured by the ASES Index score (median: 4.4), declined after 52 months. Retears occurred in six patients, primarily after 52 months, indicating long-term issues. No correlation was found between outcomes and patient age, biceps tendon pathology, or the number of anchors used.

conclusionOur study results highlight the arthroscopic modified tension-band technique as a viable option for small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears, offering favorable functional outcomes, but raising concerns about long-term patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesSuture TechniquesAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40784002
PMCPMC12456357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.