Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783988›Full record

SynthesisJoint diseases and related surgery2025

The efficacy and safety of different doses of febuxostat and allopurinol: A meta-analysis.

Feng Zhang, Yanyan Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feng Zhang
Yanyan WangDepartment of Medicament, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443000, China. wang_yyan@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis meta-analysis aims to explore the treatment effects and safety of different doses of febuxostat and allopurinol in patients with gout. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe systematically searched electronic databases and included randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of different doses of febuxostat and allopurinol on the number of patients with serum uric acid (SUA) levels ≤6.0 mg/dL, as well as on SUA levels, gout attack incidence and adverse events (AEs) in patients with gout. We calculated pooled effect sizes, including standardized mean differences (SMDs), relative risks (RRs) or risk differences (RDs), using a random-effects model, and estimated the range of effects using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 16 RCTs involving 19,683 patients were included.

resultsThe results showed that compared to allopurinol, febuxostat significantly increased the number of patients with SUA levels ≤6.0 mg/dL, particularly at doses of 40-80 mg/day (RR=1.14, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.30) and >80 mg/day (RR=2.75, 95% CI: 1.68, 4.49). Febuxostat also significantly improved SUA levels (SMD=-0.70, 95% CI: -1.02, -0.37), but had no significant effect on gout attack risk (RR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.35). The risk of any-grade AEs was lower in the febuxostat group than in the control group (RR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98), but there were no significant differences in treatment-related AEs (RR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.07) and serious AEs (RD=-0.01, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.00).

conclusionOverall, compared to allopurinol, febuxostat significantly improves SUA levels in patients with gout and has a certain safety profile. However, more high-quality studies are needed to further explore its efficacy.

Indexed as

AllopurinolFebuxostatGoutGout SuppressantsBiomarkersDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUric AcidAllopurinolBiomarkersFebuxostatGout SuppressantsUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID40783988
PMCPMC12456345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.