Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783810›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2025

Synthetic Polyploidisation Enhances Fusarium graminearum Tolerance in Wheat by Reshaping the Transcriptome and Strengthening the Microbiome.

Xin He, Xiaolin Wang, Hao Li, Jiayong Shen, Mengchen Jiang, Xiaowei Zhang, Zeng Dong, Kai Sun, Fang Nie, Zhiwei Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xin HeState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4876-2940
Xiaolin WangSouth China Institute for Soybean Innovation Research, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Precise Breeding of Future Crops, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao LiState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8271-9163
Jiayong ShenNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Mengchen JiangState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Xiaowei ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-8687
Zeng DongSouth China Institute for Soybean Innovation Research, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Precise Breeding of Future Crops, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Kai SunCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Fang NieState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Zhiwei ChenBiotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yun ZhouState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Guoyong AnState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Ertao WangNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Precise Breeding of Future Crops FCBRCE-202506Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture NT2025003National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFF1001800National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFF1002200National Natural Science Foundation of China 32088102National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370016National Natural Science Foundation of China 32425001New Cornerstone Science Foundation NCI202248Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDB0630000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidisation is a natural evolutionary mechanism that enhances plant stress tolerance and environmental adaptability; however, its impact on microbiome homeostasis remains poorly understood. In this study, we selected a nascent euploid synthetic hexaploid wheat line (HG116; 2n = 6x = 42, BBAADD) by selfing a triploid F1 hybrid of Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum (Langdon, LDN; 2n = 4x = 28, BBAA) and Aegilops tauschii Coss. (SY41; 2n = 2x = 14, DD). We investigated the effects of synthetic polyploidisation on gene expression in roots, the root-associated microbiome and tolerance to Fusarium graminearum. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that polyploidisation in HG116 predominantly upregulated genes, which were enriched in stress- and defence-related pathways, particularly those involved in responses to pathogens and biotic stress. Microbiome profiling showed that HG116 recruited beneficial bacterial taxa and suppressed potential fungal pathogen growth in its rhizosphere and root endosphere compared to its parental lines. In F. graminearum inoculation experiments, HG116 demonstrated tolerance comparable to that of the F. graminearum-resistant variety, in contrast to its susceptible parental varieties. Moreover, HG116 maintained microbial homeostasis by enriching Gram-positive bacteria such as Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. F. graminearum inoculation also triggered extensive transcriptional reprogramming in HG116, including the upregulation of dehydrin, universal stress protein and defence-related genes, which might collectively contribute to F. graminearum tolerance. These findings support the possibility that synthetic polyploidisation could enhance wheat's tolerance to F. graminearum by reshaping transcriptomic and microbial networks, offering valuable insights for developing more resilient wheat cultivars.

Indexed as

FusariumMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesPolyploidyTranscriptomeTriticumGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant Rootsdehydrindisease toleranceFusarium graminearummicrobiome homeostasispolyploidisationwheat

Identifiers

PMID40783810
PMCPMC12576463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.