ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Current Progress in the CT- and MRI-Based Detection and Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis Complications.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early non-contrast CT morphology at emergency admission in acute pancreatitis: real-world associations with clinical course.Emergency radiology · 2026Observational
- Clinical, Radiological, and Endoscopic Features of Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Walled-Off Necrosis: How to Diagnose and How to Drain Them.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP), a prevalent acute abdominal emergency, frequently leads to severe complications such as pancreatic pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections, and walled-off necrosis. These complications can progress to systemic inflammation and multiple organ failure, significantly prolonging hospitalization and markedly increasing mortality. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are nowadays indispensable in the detection and evaluation of AP complications, and each technique has its own advantages: CT, being widely available and rapid, excels at initial severity stratification and gas-containing necrosis identification; conversely, MRI, leveraging superior soft-tissue contrast and avoiding ionizing radiation, is ideal for serial monitoring - particularly in characterizing complex fluid collections (distinguishing walled-off necrosis from pancreatic pseudocysts) and detecting microlithiasis. However, the existing literature lacks systematic comparisons between CT and MRI across the full spectrum of AP complications, encompassing their imaging characteristics, clinical utility, sensitivity, and specificity. To address this gap, this review comprehensively synthesizes the diagnostic roles, efficacy, and limitations of both modalities for different AP complication types. Furthermore, it proposes novel insights for future advancements, such as AI-assisted diagnosis, multimodal complementary approaches, diffusion imaging, and other technologies, aiming to provide a contemporary perspective to inform clinical decision-making, optimize imaging pathways, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.