Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783725›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Association studies for leaf rust resistance earmark differential genomic regions for silicon (Si) responsiveness in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Prashanth Babu, Manjunath Prasad, R Nirmalaruban, Sudhir Kumar, Rajbir Yadav, Manjeet Kumar, Kiran B Gaikwad, Naresh Kumar Bainsla, S Bhaskar Reddy, Nasreen Saifi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Prashanth Babu *Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India. prashanthbabuh@gmail.com.
Manjunath Prasad *Division of Seed Science and Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
R NirmalarubanDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sudhir KumarDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rajbir YadavDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Manjeet KumarDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Kiran B GaikwadDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Naresh Kumar BainslaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
S Bhaskar ReddyDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Nasreen SaifiDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Amit Kumar MazumderDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Meda AlekyaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Gaurav KaushikDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Palaparthi DharamtejaICAR-Indian Institute of Groundnut Research, 362015, Junagadh, Gujrat, India.
Meghashri S PatilDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Shiv Kumar SinghDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Dunna VijayDivision of Seed Science and Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India.
Ranjeet Ranjan KumarDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India. ranjeetranjaniari@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilicon (Si), an important quasi-element, influences various genetic and physiological responses in enhancing plant resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses in many crops. Its uptake and deposition are markedly influenced by genetic makeup. It plays a significant role in enhancing photosynthetic efficiency, modulating hormonal balance, and activating defence mechanisms through regulating antioxidant systems and expressing defence-related genes, leading to increased stress tolerance and improved yield.

resultsThis study investigates the genetic basis of silicon (Si) response in wheat, focusing on its role in enhancing resistance to leaf rust. A diverse wheat genotype panel, coupled with multi-year data, was utilized to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with Si response. The results revealed significant genotype-specific responses under Si-treated (Si

conclusionsOur results provide important insights into the genetic basis of Si response and can assist in developing molecular markers for selecting and integrating Si-responsive genomic regions into wheat breeding lines.

Indexed as

Disease ResistancePlant DiseasesSiliconTriticumBasidiomycotaGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumQuantitative Trait LociSiliconAbiotic stressesGWASSiliconWheat

Identifiers

PMID40783725
PMCPMC12335114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.