ArticleBMC health services research2025
Implementing a digital treatment program for patients with irritable bowel syndrome into routine care: a qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators perceived by key stakeholders.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital treatment programs for irritable bowel syndrome offer multiple advantages as they enhance patient access to effective multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions while reducing individual symptom burden, in addition to alleviating strain on the healthcare systems. Despite the substantial benefits offered by digital treatment programs, exploring their implementation into routine care remain insufficient. This study aimed to systematically identify factors influencing the implementation of a digital treatment program for patients with irritable bowel syndrome as a routine intervention within a somatic secondary healthcare system.
methodsA qualitative study design was employed, and data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 key stakeholders involved in the implementation process. The sample represented several roles, ranging from high level leaders, implementation leads and physicians referring patients to the program. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilised to guide the development of the interview guide, data collection, data analysis and interpretation of the results.
resultsKey barriers were identified in the Outer Setting Domain: financing and Implementation Process Domain: planning, whereas key facilitators were found in the Innovation Domain: innovation source and innovation relative advantage; Outer Setting Domain: critical incidents; Inner Setting Domain: tension for change; and Implementation Process Domain: teaming. Among the individuals involved in the implementation, three key characteristics were identified as facilitating the implementation process: capability among high-level leaders, opportunity among mid-level leaders and referring physicians, in addition to motivation among deliverers, implementation leads, and other implementation support.
conclusionThis study provides novel insight into the multilayered factors that influence the implementation process of a digital treatment program in routine care of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Our findings demonstrate that leveraging factors that aid implementation is important, while addressing barriers is crucial to ensure sustainable implementation. Moreover, our findings provide valuable insights for future digital healthcare initiatives, highlighting the value of early planning, engagement of stakeholders, and recognition of the dynamic nature of factors influencing the implementation process in secondary healthcare systems. Secondary healthcare systems should prioritise early strategic planning, identify and engage diverse stakeholders, and develop adaptive approaches that respond to the dynamic interplay of implementation factors. We suggest that this may facilitate the adoption of effective digital interventions for chronic conditions, also beyond irritable bowel syndrome.
trial registrationThe study fell outside the scope of the Health Research Act (1) and could be conducted without the approval of the regional ethics committee. The study was registered in Helse Bergen's internal control system for research, innovation and quality improvement with project number 5226-5226 and received approval from the local Data Protection Officer who reviewed the study and the materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.