ArticleBMC cancer2025
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and pericarditis: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Cardio-Onco-Immune Axis: immunopathological mechanisms in the cardiac microenvironment of checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (H-FABP) as a Candidate Adjunctive Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cardiotoxicity: Linking Early Immune-Metabolic Myocardial Injury with Translational Cardio-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Motif-Level Graph Learning Enables Interpretable Prediction of Drug-Induced QT Prolongation via Cooperative Substructural Determinants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Advancing precision cardio-oncology: multimodal surveillance and stratified management of immunotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Mining the FAERS database reveals new safety signals for 120 mg denosumab in oncology practice.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comprehensive safety analysis of the clinical spectrum of adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on FAERS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are medications used in cancer immunotherapy. However, treatment with ICIs may lead to adverse effects, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis. This practical pharmacovigilance study investigates the relationship between ICIs and myocarditis and pericarditis using the FAERS (U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System) database. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsData on myocarditis and pericarditis related to ICIs were extracted from the FAERS database for the period from 2014Q1 to 2023Q4. Data mining was performed using the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) and the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR).
resultsA total of 1112 cases involving 1134 adverse event (AE) reports related to ICIs-associated noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (NM/P) were extracted from the FAERS database. After excluding reports with missing data, the primary reporters were physicians, consumers, and pharmacists, with the United States and Japan being the main reporting countries. The cases showed a greater percentage of males than females, with a median age of 67 years, a median weight of 65 kg, and a median onset time of 28 days. The signal strength of ICIs-associated NM/P, from highest to lowest, was as follows: Pembrolizumab (ROR: 12.32, 95% CI: 11.28-13.45, IC 025: 3.45) > Nivolumab (ROR: 11.23, 95% CI: 10.13-12.44, IC 025: 3.30) > Atezolizumab (ROR: 10.62, 95% CI: 8.67-13.02, IC 025: 3.10) > Ipilimumab (ROR: 10.25, 95% CI: 8.34-12.58, IC 025: 3.04) > Durvalumab (ROR: 9.25, 95% CI: 7.21-11.88, IC 025: 2.83).
conclusionThis study indicates that ICIs-associated NM/P significantly increases the mortality risk among cancer patients, particularly with the use of nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Strong signals for NM/P were observed with PD-1 inhibitors, pembrolizumab-based regimens, and the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Additionally, a body weight of ≥ 75 kg and the use of nivolumab and ipilimumab may be potential significant risk factors for NM/P.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.