Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783671›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions on Biopsy-to-Treatment Time in Breast Cancer: Results from the PROMPT Quality Collaborative of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers.

Danielle Thompson, Marie Fefferman, Sandra Simovic, Kristine Kuchta, Richard Bleicher, Jill Dietz, Riley Medenwald, Katharine Yao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
Marie FeffermanDepartment of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
Sandra SimovicDepartment of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
Kristine KuchtaBiostatistical Core, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Richard BleicherDepartment of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jill DietzDepartment of Surgery, New York University, Garden City, NY, USA.
Riley MedenwaldDepartment of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
Katharine YaoDepartment of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA. kyao@northshore.org.

Funding

National Research Service Award 2TL1TR002388-06National Research Service Award 5TL1TR002388-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the interval between biopsy and first treatment, the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) launched Patient-Reported Observations for Medical Procedure Timeliness (PROMPT), a quality collaborative.

methodsParticipating PROMPT sites submitted data on the number of days from biopsy to first treatment (either surgery or neoadjuvant treatment (NAC)) before and after individual site-specific quality improvement (QI) projects using the American College of Surgeons Quality Framework. The study examined interventions of sites that reported successful projects and barriers for both successful and unsuccessful sites.

resultsOf 104 PROMPT sites, 62 (59.6 %) examined the time from biopsy to surgery, and 42 (40.4 %) analyzed the time from biopsy to NAC. Overall, 56 (53.8 %) sites decreased their interval from biopsy to treatment, from 50.3 to 38.8 days for biopsy to surgery and from 40.7 to 30.9 days for biopsy to NAC. No facility factors were associated with successfully decreasing this interval. The most common intervention for both intervals was enabling navigators to schedule appointments for surgeons and medical oncologists. Of 22 interventions for the interval from biopsy to surgery, the most common included hiring a breast surgeon and increasing operating room (OR) block time for surgeons. Of 17 interventions for the interval from biopsy to NAC, the most common were streamlining port-a-cath placements, ordering staging studies before seeing medical oncology, and offering concurrent medical oncology and surgery appointments.

conclusionsJust more than half of the PROMPT sites improved their interval. Interventions to improve timely care include hiring staff and improving scheduling.

Indexed as

AccreditationBreast NeoplasmsCancer Care FacilitiesQuality ImprovementTime-to-TreatmentBiopsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisBiopsy to treatmentBreast cancerNeoadjuvant therapyPatient navigationPROMPT collaborativeQuality improvementSurgical timelinessTreatment delay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.