ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental study on the effects of low pressure and acoustic characteristics on heart rate and acoustic comfort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While extensive research exists on acoustic comfort and heart rate under normal atmospheric pressure conditions, studies examining low-pressure environments (e.g., aircraft cabins at 75-85 kPa and high-altitude trains) remain limited. Focusing on the asymptomatic pressure range (80-101 kPa, equivalent to altitudes below 3000 m), this study addresses two fundamental research questions: (1) whether atmospheric pressure and acoustic characteristics significantly affect heart rate, and (2) whether systematic variations in acoustic comfort occur with these environmental factors. Through controlled experiments combining pressure variations (80-101 kPa) with acoustic characteristics (white noise: 65/85 dB; speech/music: 70 dB), we obtained three principal findings: First, neither pressure nor acoustic characteristics (sound pressure level and sound frequency) significantly alter heart rate within this range-a finding that contrasts with known hypoxic effects observed at altitudes above 3650 m. Second, acoustic comfort decreased with reduced pressure exclusively in white noise environments (65-85 dB), while it remained stable for speech and music at 70 dB. Third, we established both an acoustic comfort evaluation function and frequency-band-specific comfort zones, which enable differentiated noise control standards across frequency bands and identify 75 dB as a critical threshold and low-frequency noise as key design parameters. These results yield the first piecewise comfort evaluation function specifically developed for low-pressure transportation environments. The findings provide immediate applications for noise control strategies in both aviation and high-altitude rail systems, offering scientifically grounded standards for environmental design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.