Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783600›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Balancing livestock free grazing and ecosystem functionality: investigating the carrying capacity of grazing land in the Eastern Savannah of Rwanda.

Mupenzi Mutimura, Athanase Mukuralinda, Jean Damascene Ndayambaje, Thomas Gakwavu, Jean Claude Bambe, Ermias Betemariam, Olivier Habimana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mupenzi MutimuraAgriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), P.O. Box 5016, Kigali, Rwanda. m.mutimura@rab.gov.rw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-4152
Athanase MukuralindaCIFOR-ICRAF, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Damascene NdayambajeCIFOR-ICRAF, Kigali, Rwanda.
Thomas GakwavuCIFOR-ICRAF, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Claude BambeCIFOR-ICRAF, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ermias BetemariamCIFOR-ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya.
Olivier HabimanaInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Drylands Resilience Unit, P.O. Box 6935, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on investigating the carrying capacity of individual grazing lands in the Eastern Province of Rwanda. We collected data on above-ground biomass of natural pasture from 63 farms during the wet and dry seasons to capture the seasonal variation of forages. Since the grazing system is based on individual farms, we clustered farm size into three clusters, namely ≤ 10.9 ha (small); 11-20.9 ha (medium) and ≥ 21 ha (large). Dry matter and chemical composition of biomass samples was determined. Additionally, as crop residues are a significant feed resource for farmers, we also estimated their production for the year 2023 because of the availability of reliable data over the corresponding two agricultural seasons. Dry matter exhibited significant difference (p < 0.0001) across both farm sizes and seasons. Similarly, crude protein showed significant difference (p < 0.0001) across farm sizes and seasons. The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) showed only significant difference across the seasons (p < 0.0001). Acid detergent fibre (ADF) showed significant difference (p < 0.05) across both farm sizes and seasons. The interaction between farm size and season was significant difference (p < 0.0001) for NDF and ADF (p = 0.0085). Furthermore, the tropical Livestock Unit (TLU), showed that the available biomass in the medium farm could feed only the TLU for a period of 58 days while the small farm could only feed for 42 days whilst the crop residues could meet the dry matter intake of 171,750 TLU annually. The findings suggest the effective crop residue utilization and highlight that proper grazing land management strategies should be applied for optimizing cattle productivity, ensuring sustainability, and climate resilience.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryEcosystemLivestockAnimalsBiomassCattleGrasslandHerbivoryRwandaSeasonsBiodiversity conservationCrop residues productionGrazing landLivestock managementSustainable grazing practices

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.