Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783575›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hybrid strategy enhanced crayfish optimization algorithm for breast cancer prediction.

Yu-Jiong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yu-Jiong LiSchool of Information, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 030000, Taiyuan, China. pbxy66@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA) suffers from degradation of diversity, insufficient exploratory capability, a propensity to become caught in local optima, and an imprecise search engine for optimization. To address these issues, the current research introduces a hybrid strategy enhanced crayfish optimization algorithm (MSCOA). Initially, a chaotic inverse exploration initialization method is utilized to establish the population's position with high diversity, significantly enhancing the global exploration capability. Second, an adaptive t-distributed feeding strategy was employed to define the connection between feeding behavior and temperature, increasing population variety and enhanced the algorithm's local search effectiveness. Finally, an adaptive ternary optimization mechanism is introduced in the exploration phase: a curve growth acceleration factor is used to collaboratively guide global and individual optimal information, while a hybrid adaptive cosine exponential weigh dynamically adjusts the search intensity. Additionally, an inverse worst individual variant reinforcement approach is employed to enhance the population evolution efficiency. In the hybrid test sets of CEC2005 and CEC2019, MSCOA shows improved convergence accuracy compared to the traditional COA algorithm, and the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05) confirms its superiority over five other comparison algorithms. MSCOA outperforms other algorithms in terms of robustness, convergence speed, and solution accuracy, although there is still room for further improvement. When combined with Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and applied to the Wisconsin breast cancer dataset, the MSCOA-ELM model achieved 100% accuracy and F1 score, a 28.9% improvement over the baseline ELM, demonstrating the algorithm's efficiency and generalization ability in solving practical optimization problems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAstacoideaBreast NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansCancer predictionChaotic initializationCrayfish optimization algorithmELMT-distribution feeding strategyTernary optimization mechanism

Identifiers

PMID40783575
PMCPMC12335545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.