Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783556›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025

Prevalence and types of medication errors in pro re nata medication orders among hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional study.

Arefeh Rasouli-Rad, Mahdi Ahmadinia, Azadeh Eshraghi, Hamidreza Aslani, Zahra Karimian, Akram Hashemi, Maryam Farasatinasab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arefeh Rasouli-RadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi AhmadiniaLung Transplantation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh EshraghiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamidreza AslaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra KarimianInternational Affairs Office, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Akram HashemiCenter for Educational Research in Medical Science (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam FarasatinasabDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. maryfarasati@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors in Pro Re Nata (PRN) prescriptions pose a significant threat in hospital settings, especially due to unclear prescribing practices. Despite growing attention to patient safety, documentation for PRN orders remains poor, increasing the risk of medication errors and adverse drug events. To assess the prevalence and types of PRN medication errors in hospitalized patients, identify high-risk drugs, and explore factors linked to prescribing errors.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 at an Educational and Research Hospital. It included 400 hospitalized patients who had received at least one PRN prescription. Data were collected using a standardized extraction form based on clinical guidelines and expert consultation. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate error trends and associated risk factors.

resultsA total of 74.1% of PRN prescriptions lacked a documented indication, and 91.1% had no recorded dosage interval. Pethidine (32.6%) was the most frequently prescribed PRN medication. The Surgical ICU showed a significantly higher number of errors (p < 0.05). Major predictors of PRN errors included missing dosage intervals and admission to high-dependency wards.

conclusionsThe high frequency of PRN prescribing errors underscores the urgent need for improved documentation and targeted training. Structured interventions such as electronic prescribing and focused medical education can help reduce errors and improve patient safety. Structured interventions such as electronic prescribing, regulatory enforcement, and focused medical education can help reduce errors and improve patient safety.

Indexed as

Hospital safetyMedication errorsPatient safetyPrescribing practicesPRN prescriptions

Identifiers

PMID40783556
PMCPMC12681110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.